critique the competing interpretation
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.krytycznie oceniać konkurencyjną interpretację
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
critique the competing interpretation
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2Warning or invitation
- A
The note can be read as a warning or an invitation.
Notatkę można odczytać jako ostrzeżenie albo zaproszenie.
- B
How can we critique the competing interpretation in this analysis?
Jak w tej analizie możemy krytycznie oceniać konkurencyjną interpretację?
- A
Let’s separate the claim’s content from the premises supporting it.
Oddzielmy treść twierdzenia od przesłanek, które je wspierają.
- B
Let’s check its context and closing lines.
Sprawdźmy kontekst nadania i zakończenie notatki.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Czy można krytycznie oceniać konkurencyjną interpretację, nie przemycając tego samego założenia, które jest przedmiotem sporu?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Can one critique the competing interpretation without quietly importing the very assumption under dispute?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Kann man die konkurrierende Interpretation kritisieren, ohne stillschweigend genau jene umstrittene Annahme einzuführen?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.¿Es posible criticar la interpretación alternativa sin introducir de manera tácita el supuesto que está en discusión?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Можно ли критически оценивать конкурирующую интерпретацию, не вводя исподволь именно то допущение, которое является предметом спора?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- critique the competing interpretation
Present
| I | critique the competing interpretation |
|---|---|
| you | critique the competing interpretation |
| he / she / it | critiques the competing interpretation |
| we | critique the competing interpretation |
| you (plural) | critique the competing interpretation |
| they | critique the competing interpretation |
Past
| I | critiqued the competing interpretation |
|---|---|
| you | critiqued the competing interpretation |
| he / she / it | critiqued the competing interpretation |
| we | critiqued the competing interpretation |
| you (plural) | critiqued the competing interpretation |
| they | critiqued the competing interpretation |
Future
| I | will critique the competing interpretation |
|---|---|
| you | will critique the competing interpretation |
| he / she / it | will critique the competing interpretation |
| we | will critique the competing interpretation |
| you (plural) | will critique the competing interpretation |
| they | will critique the competing interpretation |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
Can one critique the competing interpretation without quietly importing the very assumption under dispute?