problematize the ontological commitment
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.problematyzować zobowiązanie ontologiczne
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
problematize the ontological commitment
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2What the model assumes
- A
The model treats preferences as stable properties of individuals.
Model traktuje preferencje jako trwałe własności osób.
- B
How can we problematize the ontological commitment in this debate?
Jak w tym sporze możemy problematyzować zobowiązanie ontologiczne?
- A
Let’s identify the question that the apparently obvious concept overlooks.
Wskażmy pytanie, które pozornie oczywiste pojęcie pomija.
- B
Let’s list the entities and properties whose existence we assume.
Wypiszmy byty i własności, których istnienie zakładamy.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Czy można problematyzować zobowiązanie ontologiczne, nie przemycając tego samego założenia, które jest przedmiotem sporu?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Can one problematize the ontological commitment without quietly importing the very assumption under dispute?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Kann man die ontologische Festlegung problematisieren, ohne stillschweigend genau jene umstrittene Annahme einzuführen?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.¿Es posible problematizar el compromiso ontológico sin introducir de manera tácita el supuesto que está en discusión?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Можно ли проблематизировать онтологическое обязательство, не вводя исподволь именно то допущение, которое является предметом спора?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- problematize the ontological commitment
Present
| I | problematize the ontological commitment |
|---|---|
| you | problematize the ontological commitment |
| he / she / it | problematizes the ontological commitment |
| we | problematize the ontological commitment |
| you (plural) | problematize the ontological commitment |
| they | problematize the ontological commitment |
Past
| I | problematized the ontological commitment |
|---|---|
| you | problematized the ontological commitment |
| he / she / it | problematized the ontological commitment |
| we | problematized the ontological commitment |
| you (plural) | problematized the ontological commitment |
| they | problematized the ontological commitment |
Future
| I | will problematize the ontological commitment |
|---|---|
| you | will problematize the ontological commitment |
| he / she / it | will problematize the ontological commitment |
| we | will problematize the ontological commitment |
| you (plural) | will problematize the ontological commitment |
| they | will problematize the ontological commitment |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
Can one problematize the ontological commitment without quietly importing the very assumption under dispute?