EN · C2 · verb

reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence

Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.

No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.

godzić ocenę możliwą do obrony ze sprzecznymi dowodami

No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Set up flashcard learning
Word by word

Voice analyzer

Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.

Flashcard #6970 · C2

reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence

Ready for your attempt

Preliminary recognized words

Start speaking — your text will appear here.

This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.
Best score—
Attempts0
Streak ≥80%0

Checking recognition support…

Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.

Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.

This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.

How is the score calculated?

Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.

Dialogues in context

EN · C2

Discussing meaning in context

  1. A

    The report authors set out to reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence because two sources conflicted even though both supported a cautious conclusion.

    Autorzy raportu postanowili godzić ocenę możliwą do obrony ze sprzecznymi dowodami, ponieważ dwa źródła sobie przeczyły, choć oba wspierały ostrożny wniosek.

  2. B

    How do you understand the expression “reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence” in this situation?

    Jak rozumiesz wyrażenie „godzić ocenę możliwą do obrony ze sprzecznymi dowodami” w tej sytuacji?

  3. A

    Let’s first establish the meaning in this context. Identify details in the example that support this reading and separate them from our assumptions.

    Najpierw ustalmy znaczenie w tym kontekście. Wskażmy w przykładzie szczegóły, które wspierają takie odczytanie, i oddzielmy je od własnych założeń.

  4. B

    I’ll compare this passage with another example and check whether the expression keeps the same meaning.

    Porównam ten fragment z drugim przykładem i sprawdzę, czy to wyrażenie zachowuje w nim ten sam sens.

No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.

Translations

Polishgodzić ocenę możliwą do obrony ze sprzecznymi dowodamiverbNo voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Germanein vertretbares Urteil mit widersprüchlichen Belegen in Einklang bringenverbNo voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Spanishconciliar un juicio defendible con pruebas contradictoriasverbNo voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Russianсогласовывать обоснованное суждение с противоречивыми доказательствамиverbNo voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.

Examples of use

Polish

Autorzy raportu postanowili godzić ocenę możliwą do obrony ze sprzecznymi dowodami, ponieważ dwa źródła sobie przeczyły, choć oba wspierały ostrożny wniosek.

No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
English

The report authors set out to reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence because two sources conflicted even though both supported a cautious conclusion.

No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
German

Die Verfasser des Berichts wollten ein vertretbares Urteil mit widersprüchlichen Belegen in Einklang bringen, weil zwei Quellen einander widersprachen, obwohl beide eine vorsichtige Schlussfolgerung stützten.

No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Spanish

Los autores del informe decidieron conciliar un juicio defendible con pruebas contradictorias porque dos fuentes se contradecían, aunque ambas respaldaban una conclusión prudente.

No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Russian

Авторы доклада решили согласовывать обоснованное суждение с противоречивыми доказательствами, поскольку два источника противоречили друг другу, хотя оба поддерживали осторожный вывод.

No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.

Grammar

verb

Dictionary form
reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence

Present

Present
Ireconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
youreconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
he / she / itreconciles a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
wereconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
you (plural)reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
theyreconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence

Past

Past
Ireconciled a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
youreconciled a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
he / she / itreconciled a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
wereconciled a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
you (plural)reconciled a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
theyreconciled a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence

Future

Future
Iwill reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
youwill reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
he / she / itwill reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
wewill reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
you (plural)will reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
theywill reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence
  • Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
  • The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.

Example

The report authors set out to reconcile a defensible judgment with conflicting evidence because two sources conflicted even though both supported a cautious conclusion.

Start studying

Start studying →