rigorously defend the logical inference
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.rygorystycznie bronić wniosku logicznego
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
rigorously defend the logical inference
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2Logical inference
- A
This conclusion is supposed to follow from three earlier statements.
Ten wniosek ma wynikać z trzech wcześniejszych stwierdzeń.
- B
On that basis, can we rigorously defend the logical inference?
Czy na tej podstawie możemy rygorystycznie bronić wniosku logicznego?
- A
First we need to examine the basis for that assessment.
Najpierw musimy sprawdzić podstawy tej oceny.
- B
Let’s check every step of the reasoning and a possible counterexample.
Sprawdźmy każdy krok rozumowania i możliwy kontrprzykład.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Badaczka może rygorystycznie bronić wniosku logicznego po sprawdzeniu każdego kroku dowodu.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.The scholar may rigorously defend the logical inference after checking every step of the proof.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Die Wissenschaftlerin kann nach Prüfung jedes Schritts des Beweises die logische Schlussfolgerung rigoros verteidigen.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.La investigadora puede defender rigurosamente la inferencia lógica tras revisar cada paso de la demostración.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Исследовательница может строго отстаивать логический вывод после проверки каждого шага доказательства.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- rigorously defend the logical inference
Present
| I | rigorously defend the logical inference |
|---|---|
| you | rigorously defend the logical inference |
| he / she / it | rigorously defends the logical inference |
| we | rigorously defend the logical inference |
| you (plural) | rigorously defend the logical inference |
| they | rigorously defend the logical inference |
Past
| I | rigorously defended the logical inference |
|---|---|
| you | rigorously defended the logical inference |
| he / she / it | rigorously defended the logical inference |
| we | rigorously defended the logical inference |
| you (plural) | rigorously defended the logical inference |
| they | rigorously defended the logical inference |
Future
| I | will rigorously defend the logical inference |
|---|---|
| you | will rigorously defend the logical inference |
| he / she / it | will rigorously defend the logical inference |
| we | will rigorously defend the logical inference |
| you (plural) | will rigorously defend the logical inference |
| they | will rigorously defend the logical inference |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
The scholar may rigorously defend the logical inference after checking every step of the proof.
