scrutinize the knowledge claim
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.wnikliwie analizować roszczenie poznawcze
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
scrutinize the knowledge claim
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2The strength of a knowledge claim
- A
The author writes “we know”, despite having only indirect grounds.
Autor pisze „wiemy”, choć dysponuje jedynie pośrednimi przesłankami.
- B
How can we scrutinize the knowledge claim in this debate?
Jak w tym sporze możemy wnikliwie analizować roszczenie poznawcze?
- A
Let’s set out the argument fully and examine every step.
Rozpiszmy argument bez skrótów i sprawdźmy każde przejście.
- B
Let’s compare the strength of the claim with its justification.
Porównajmy siłę deklaracji z dostępnym uzasadnieniem.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Czy można wnikliwie analizować roszczenie poznawcze, nie przemycając tego samego założenia, które jest przedmiotem sporu?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Can one scrutinize the knowledge claim without quietly importing the very assumption under dispute?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Kann man den Wissensanspruch gründlich prüfen, ohne stillschweigend genau jene umstrittene Annahme einzuführen?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.¿Es posible examinar minuciosamente la afirmación de conocimiento sin introducir de manera tácita el supuesto que está en discusión?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Можно ли тщательно анализировать притязание на знание, не вводя исподволь именно то допущение, которое является предметом спора?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- scrutinize the knowledge claim
Present
| I | scrutinize the knowledge claim |
|---|---|
| you | scrutinize the knowledge claim |
| he / she / it | scrutinizes the knowledge claim |
| we | scrutinize the knowledge claim |
| you (plural) | scrutinize the knowledge claim |
| they | scrutinize the knowledge claim |
Past
| I | scrutinized the knowledge claim |
|---|---|
| you | scrutinized the knowledge claim |
| he / she / it | scrutinized the knowledge claim |
| we | scrutinized the knowledge claim |
| you (plural) | scrutinized the knowledge claim |
| they | scrutinized the knowledge claim |
Future
| I | will scrutinize the knowledge claim |
|---|---|
| you | will scrutinize the knowledge claim |
| he / she / it | will scrutinize the knowledge claim |
| we | will scrutinize the knowledge claim |
| you (plural) | will scrutinize the knowledge claim |
| they | will scrutinize the knowledge claim |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
Can one scrutinize the knowledge claim without quietly importing the very assumption under dispute?