compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.porównywać kryterium wiarygodności biologicznej w dwóch badaniach
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2A hypothesis in a methods exercise
- A
In a seminar, we discuss a hypothetical diagram and data needed to assess its assumptions.
Na seminarium omawiamy hipotetyczny diagram i rodzaje danych potrzebnych do oceny jego założeń.
- B
How can we compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies here?
Jak możemy tu porównywać kryterium wiarygodności biologicznej w dwóch badaniach?
- A
Let’s use the same criteria and state differences in the two cases’ conditions explicitly.
Użyjmy tych samych kryteriów i jawnie wskażmy różnice warunków w obu przypadkach.
- B
Let’s state the hypothesis’s scope and unanswered questions.
Zapiszmy zakres hipotezy i pytania pozostające bez odpowiedzi.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Zespół badawczy postanowił porównywać kryterium wiarygodności biologicznej w dwóch badaniach, ponieważ wyniki dwóch badań wskazywały, że wynik in vitro nie miał jeszcze potwierdzenia w badaniach u ludzi.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.The research team set out to compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies because results from two studies showed that the in-vitro result had not yet been confirmed in human studies.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Das Forschungsteam wollte das Kriterium der biologischen Plausibilität in zwei Studien vergleichen, weil Ergebnisse aus zwei Studien zeigten, dass das In-vitro-Ergebnis noch nicht in Studien am Menschen bestätigt worden war.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.El equipo de investigación decidió comparar el criterio de plausibilidad biológica en dos estudios porque los resultados de dos estudios mostraban que el resultado in vitro aún no se había confirmado en estudios con personas.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Исследовательская группа решила сравнивать критерий биологической правдоподобности в двух исследованиях, поскольку результаты двух исследований показывали, что результат in vitro ещё не был подтверждён в исследованиях с участием людей.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies
Present
| I | compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
|---|---|
| you | compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| he / she / it | compares the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| we | compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| you (plural) | compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| they | compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
Past
| I | compared the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
|---|---|
| you | compared the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| he / she / it | compared the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| we | compared the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| you (plural) | compared the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| they | compared the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
Future
| I | will compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
|---|---|
| you | will compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| he / she / it | will compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| we | will compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| you (plural) | will compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
| they | will compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
The research team set out to compare the biological plausibility criterion across two studies because results from two studies showed that the in-vitro result had not yet been confirmed in human studies.