substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.uzasadniać argument dotyczący niejednoznaczności ustawy
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2Two readings of a sample provision
- A
One word in a sample provision allows two readings.
Jedno słowo w przykładowym przepisie dopuszcza dwa odczytania.
- B
How can we substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity here?
Jak możemy tu uzasadniać argument dotyczący niejednoznaczności ustawy?
- A
Let’s identify premises and explain how they support the conclusion rather than assume it.
Wskażmy przesłanki i wyjaśnijmy, dlaczego prowadzą do wniosku, zamiast zakładać go z góry.
- B
Let’s compare both readings with context and consequences in this example.
Zestawmy oba odczytania z kontekstem i skutkami w tym przykładzie.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Badacze postanowili uzasadniać argument dotyczący niejednoznaczności ustawy, ponieważ ten sam przepis dopuszczał dwa sprzeczne odczytania.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.The researchers set out to substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity because the same provision supported two conflicting readings.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Die Forschenden wollten ein Argument über die gesetzliche Mehrdeutigkeit belegen, weil dieselbe Vorschrift zwei widersprüchliche Auslegungen zuließ.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Los investigadores decidieron fundamentar un argumento sobre la ambigüedad de la ley porque la misma disposición admitía dos interpretaciones contradictorias.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Исследователи решили обосновывать аргумент, затрагивающий неоднозначность закона, поскольку одно и то же положение допускало два противоречащих друг другу толкования.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity
Present
| I | substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
|---|---|
| you | substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| he / she / it | substantiates an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| we | substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| you (plural) | substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| they | substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
Past
| I | substantiated an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
|---|---|
| you | substantiated an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| he / she / it | substantiated an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| we | substantiated an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| you (plural) | substantiated an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| they | substantiated an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
Future
| I | will substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
|---|---|
| you | will substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| he / she / it | will substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| we | will substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| you (plural) | will substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
| they | will substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
The researchers set out to substantiate an argument concerning the statutory ambiguity because the same provision supported two conflicting readings.