substantiate the knowledge claim
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.uzasadniać roszczenie poznawcze
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
substantiate the knowledge claim
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2Certainty from one account
- A
The author treats one participant’s account as certain knowledge.
Autor uznaje relację jednego uczestnika za pewną wiedzę.
- B
How can we substantiate the knowledge claim in this analysis?
Jak w tej analizie możemy uzasadniać roszczenie poznawcze?
- A
Let’s identify arguments and evidence rather than assume the conclusion.
Wskażmy argumenty i dowody, zamiast zakładać wniosek z góry.
- B
Let’s compare that account with an independent source.
Porównajmy tę relację z niezależnym źródłem.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Czy można uzasadniać roszczenie poznawcze, nie przemycając tego samego założenia, które jest przedmiotem sporu?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Can one substantiate the knowledge claim without quietly importing the very assumption under dispute?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Kann man den Wissensanspruch belegen, ohne stillschweigend genau jene umstrittene Annahme einzuführen?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.¿Es posible fundamentar la afirmación de conocimiento sin introducir de manera tácita el supuesto que está en discusión?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Можно ли обосновывать притязание на знание, не вводя исподволь именно то допущение, которое является предметом спора?
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- substantiate the knowledge claim
Present
| I | substantiate the knowledge claim |
|---|---|
| you | substantiate the knowledge claim |
| he / she / it | substantiates the knowledge claim |
| we | substantiate the knowledge claim |
| you (plural) | substantiate the knowledge claim |
| they | substantiate the knowledge claim |
Past
| I | substantiated the knowledge claim |
|---|---|
| you | substantiated the knowledge claim |
| he / she / it | substantiated the knowledge claim |
| we | substantiated the knowledge claim |
| you (plural) | substantiated the knowledge claim |
| they | substantiated the knowledge claim |
Future
| I | will substantiate the knowledge claim |
|---|---|
| you | will substantiate the knowledge claim |
| he / she / it | will substantiate the knowledge claim |
| we | will substantiate the knowledge claim |
| you (plural) | will substantiate the knowledge claim |
| they | will substantiate the knowledge claim |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
Can one substantiate the knowledge claim without quietly importing the very assumption under dispute?