A claim that an outcome was inevitable requires stronger justification than a claim that it was the most likely under the circumstances.
Learn a useful phrase in context, listen to its pronunciation and practise saying it.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Teza o nieuchronności wyniku wymaga mocniejszego uzasadnienia niż teza, że w danych okolicznościach był on najbardziej prawdopodobny.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
A claim that an outcome was inevitable requires stronger justification than a claim that it was the most likely under the circumstances.
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2- A
It was the most likely outcome, so it was inevitable.
To było najbardziej prawdopodobne, więc nieuchronne.
- B
A claim that an outcome was inevitable requires stronger justification than a claim that it was the most likely under the circumstances.
Teza o nieuchronności wyniku wymaga mocniejszego uzasadnienia niż teza, że w danych okolicznościach był on najbardziej prawdopodobny.
- A
What do you suggest, then?
Co zatem proponujesz?
- B
Let’s separate high probability from the absence of alternatives.
Oddzielmy wysokie prawdopodobieństwo od braku alternatywy.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
- A
What shall we clarify to avoid a misunderstanding?
Co doprecyzujemy, żeby uniknąć nieporozumienia?
- B
A claim that an outcome was inevitable requires stronger justification than a claim that it was the most likely under the circumstances.
Teza o nieuchronności wyniku wymaga mocniejszego uzasadnienia niż teza, że w danych okolicznościach był on najbardziej prawdopodobny.
- A
What will help us compare these perspectives?
Co pomoże nam porównać te perspektywy?
- B
Let’s start with one example and note what accounts for the difference.
Zacznijmy od jednego przykładu i zapiszmy, z czego wynika różnica.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Ocena granic wnioskowania i sposobu uzasadnienia tezy.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Assessing the limits of inference and how a claim is justified.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grenzen des Schlussfolgerns und die Begründung einer These bewerten.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Evaluar los límites de la inferencia y la justificación de una tesis.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Оценка границ вывода и способа обоснования тезиса.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.