A gap left by an editor in the published transcript is not automatically the speaker's paralipsis; let us distinguish subsequent deletion from a rhetorical pretence of omission within the utterance itself.
Learn a useful phrase in context, listen to its pronunciation and practise saying it.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Luka pozostawiona przez redaktora w publikowanym zapisie nie jest automatycznie paralipsą mówcy; odróżnijmy późniejsze usunięcie fragmentu od retorycznego pozoru pominięcia w samej wypowiedzi.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
A gap left by an editor in the published transcript is not automatically the speaker's paralipsis; let us distinguish subsequent deletion from a rhetorical pretence of omission within the utterance itself.
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2- A
Why are there three dots after the question in the transcript?
Dlaczego w stenogramie po pytaniu są trzy kropki?
- B
A gap left by an editor in the published transcript is not automatically the speaker's paralipsis; let us distinguish subsequent deletion from a rhetorical pretence of omission within the utterance itself.
Luka pozostawiona przez redaktora w publikowanym zapisie nie jest automatycznie paralipsą mówcy; odróżnijmy późniejsze usunięcie fragmentu od retorycznego pozoru pominięcia w samej wypowiedzi.
- A
The editors say in a footnote that they shortened the answer.
W przypisie redakcja przyznaje, że skróciła odpowiedź.
- B
Let's attribute the gap to the editors in our description.
W opisie przypiszmy lukę redakcji.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
- A
How shall we describe a declared omission of a topic?
Jak opiszemy deklarację pominięcia tematu?
- B
A gap left by an editor in the published transcript is not automatically the speaker's paralipsis; let us distinguish subsequent deletion from a rhetorical pretence of omission within the utterance itself.
Luka pozostawiona przez redaktora w publikowanym zapisie nie jest automatycznie paralipsą mówcy; odróżnijmy późniejsze usunięcie fragmentu od retorycznego pozoru pominięcia w samej wypowiedzi.
- A
How shall we show this through a concrete example?
Jak pokażemy to na konkretnym przykładzie?
- B
Let’s compare the declaration with what the listener actually heard and identify its effect.
Zestawmy deklarację z tym, co odbiorca faktycznie usłyszał, i wskażmy wywołany efekt.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Omawianie retorycznego pozornego pominięcia.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Discussing rhetorical pretended omission.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Rhetorisches vorgebliches Übergehen besprechen.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Comentar la omisión retórica aparente.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Обсуждение риторического мнимого умолчания.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.