The most striking statement in a dispute need not represent the majority view; it may stand out precisely because it departs so far from it.
Learn a useful phrase in context, listen to its pronunciation and practise saying it.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Najbardziej wyrazista wypowiedź w sporze nie musi reprezentować stanowiska większości; jej widoczność może wynikać właśnie z tego, jak dalece od niego odbiega.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
The most striking statement in a dispute need not represent the majority view; it may stand out precisely because it departs so far from it.
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2- A
The loudest voice probably reflects the majority’s view.
Najgłośniejszy głos chyba wyraża opinię większości.
- B
The most striking statement in a dispute need not represent the majority view; it may stand out precisely because it departs so far from it.
Najbardziej wyrazista wypowiedź w sporze nie musi reprezentować stanowiska większości; jej widoczność może wynikać właśnie z tego, jak dalece od niego odbiega.
- A
What do you suggest, then?
Co zatem proponujesz?
- B
Let’s examine the distribution of views rather than visibility alone.
Sprawdźmy rozkład stanowisk zamiast samej widoczności wypowiedzi.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
- A
How shall we account for the limits of data and explanations?
Jak uwzględnimy ograniczenia danych i wyjaśnień?
- B
The most striking statement in a dispute need not represent the majority view; it may stand out precisely because it departs so far from it.
Najbardziej wyrazista wypowiedź w sporze nie musi reprezentować stanowiska większości; jej widoczność może wynikać właśnie z tego, jak dalece od niego odbiega.
- A
What will help us compare these perspectives?
Co pomoże nam porównać te perspektywy?
- B
Let’s start with one example and note what accounts for the difference.
Zacznijmy od jednego przykładu i zapiszmy, z czego wynika różnica.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Analiza założeń i sposobu sformułowania wypowiedzi.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Analysing assumptions and how a statement is framed.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Annahmen und die Formulierung einer Aussage analysieren.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Analizar los supuestos y la formulación de una afirmación.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Анализ предпосылок и формулировки высказывания.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.