compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.porównywać niespójność pojęciową w dwóch argumentacjach
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2Two definitions
- A
In one passage the concept includes intention, elsewhere only effects.
W jednym miejscu pojęcie obejmuje intencję, w innym tylko skutek.
- B
How can we compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments in this analysis?
Jak w tej analizie możemy porównywać niespójność pojęciową w dwóch argumentacjach?
- A
Let’s use the same criteria for both arguments.
Przyjmijmy te same kryteria dla obu argumentacji.
- B
Let’s compare the definitions and their use in conclusions.
Porównajmy definicje i ich użycie we wnioskach.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Wykład stał się naprawdę odkrywczy, gdy prelegent zaczął porównywać niespójność pojęciową w dwóch argumentacjach poprzez pomijany dotąd przypadek historyczny.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.The keynote became genuinely illuminating when the speaker began to compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments through a neglected historical case.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Der Hauptvortrag wurde aufschlussreich, als der Redner anhand eines vernachlässigten historischen Falls begann, die begriffliche Inkonsistenz in zwei Argumentationen zu vergleichen.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.La conferencia resultó esclarecedora cuando el ponente empezó a comparar la inconsistencia conceptual en dos argumentaciones mediante un caso histórico olvidado.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Доклад стал содержательным, когда выступающий начал сравнивать концептуальную непоследовательность в двух аргументациях на примере забытого исторического случая.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments
Present
| I | compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
|---|---|
| you | compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| he / she / it | compares the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| we | compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| you (plural) | compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| they | compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
Past
| I | compared the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
|---|---|
| you | compared the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| he / she / it | compared the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| we | compared the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| you (plural) | compared the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| they | compared the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
Future
| I | will compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
|---|---|
| you | will compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| he / she / it | will compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| we | will compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| you (plural) | will compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
| they | will compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
The keynote became genuinely illuminating when the speaker began to compare the conceptual inconsistency across two arguments through a neglected historical case.