compare the normative implication across two arguments
Explore the meaning in context and practise the word or sentence.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.porównywać implikację normatywną w dwóch argumentacjach
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
compare the normative implication across two arguments
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2From statistics to a recommendation
- A
A statistical description ends with a recommendation for fair distribution.
Opis statystyczny kończy się zaleceniem sprawiedliwego podziału.
- B
How can we compare the normative implication across two arguments in this analysis?
Jak w tej analizie możemy porównywać implikację normatywną w dwóch argumentacjach?
- A
Let’s use the same criteria for both arguments.
Przyjmijmy te same kryteria dla obu argumentacji.
- B
Let’s separate descriptive findings from the adopted value principle.
Oddzielmy ustalenia opisowe od przyjętej zasady wartościowania.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Jeden przypis zmusił autora, aby porównywać implikację normatywną w dwóch argumentacjach, co ostatecznie zmieniło konstrukcję całego rozdziału.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.A single footnote forced the author to compare the normative implication across two arguments and ultimately altered the architecture of the entire chapter.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Eine einzige Fußnote zwang den Autor dazu, die normative Implikation in zwei Argumentationen zu vergleichen, und veränderte schließlich den Aufbau des gesamten Kapitels.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Una sola nota al pie obligó al autor a comparar la implicación normativa en dos argumentaciones y acabó cambiando la arquitectura de todo el capítulo.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Одна сноска заставила автора сравнивать нормативное следствие в двух аргументациях и в итоге изменила структуру всей главы.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Grammar
verb
- Dictionary form
- compare the normative implication across two arguments
Present
| I | compare the normative implication across two arguments |
|---|---|
| you | compare the normative implication across two arguments |
| he / she / it | compares the normative implication across two arguments |
| we | compare the normative implication across two arguments |
| you (plural) | compare the normative implication across two arguments |
| they | compare the normative implication across two arguments |
Past
| I | compared the normative implication across two arguments |
|---|---|
| you | compared the normative implication across two arguments |
| he / she / it | compared the normative implication across two arguments |
| we | compared the normative implication across two arguments |
| you (plural) | compared the normative implication across two arguments |
| they | compared the normative implication across two arguments |
Future
| I | will compare the normative implication across two arguments |
|---|---|
| you | will compare the normative implication across two arguments |
| he / she / it | will compare the normative implication across two arguments |
| we | will compare the normative implication across two arguments |
| you (plural) | will compare the normative implication across two arguments |
| they | will compare the normative implication across two arguments |
- Present Simple, Past Simple and future with will. These tables show statements.
- The table conjugates the main verb in the context of the whole expression. Nouns, adjectives and dependent infinitives inside it are not separate headwords.
Example
A single footnote forced the author to compare the normative implication across two arguments and ultimately altered the architecture of the entire chapter.