A story's internal consistency does not guarantee agreement with events if every detail was selected on the basis of a single unverified assumption.
Learn a useful phrase in context, listen to its pronunciation and practise saying it.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Spójność wewnętrzna opowieści nie gwarantuje zgodności z wydarzeniami, jeśli wszystkie szczegóły dobrano na podstawie jednego niezweryfikowanego założenia.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
A story's internal consistency does not guarantee agreement with events if every detail was selected on the basis of a single unverified assumption.
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2- A
The story is coherent, so it must be true.
Historia jest spójna, więc musi być prawdziwa.
- B
A story's internal consistency does not guarantee agreement with events if every detail was selected on the basis of a single unverified assumption.
Spójność wewnętrzna opowieści nie gwarantuje zgodności z wydarzeniami, jeśli wszystkie szczegóły dobrano na podstawie jednego niezweryfikowanego założenia.
- A
How do you suggest we approach it?
Jak proponujesz do tego podejść?
- B
Let’s independently check its central assumption.
Sprawdźmy niezależnie jej podstawowe założenie.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
- A
How shall we assess the strength of this justification?
Jak sprawdzimy siłę tego uzasadnienia?
- B
A story's internal consistency does not guarantee agreement with events if every detail was selected on the basis of a single unverified assumption.
Spójność wewnętrzna opowieści nie gwarantuje zgodności z wydarzeniami, jeśli wszystkie szczegóły dobrano na podstawie jednego niezweryfikowanego założenia.
- A
What should we clarify before drawing a conclusion?
Co warto doprecyzować przed wyciągnięciem wniosku?
- B
Let’s specify the situation the statement refers to and which conditions must not be omitted.
Wskażmy, do jakiej sytuacji odnosi się wypowiedź i których warunków nie wolno pominąć.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Rozróżnianie siły argumentu, granic wniosku i warunków uzasadnienia.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Distinguishing an argument's strength, the limits of a conclusion and conditions of justification.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Argumentstärke, Schlussfolgerungsgrenzen und Begründungsbedingungen unterscheiden.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Distinguir la fuerza de un argumento, los límites de una conclusión y las condiciones de justificación.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Различение силы аргумента, границ вывода и условий обоснования.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.