The author concedes a point to an opponent only to undermine the significance of that concession in the next sentence.
Learn a useful phrase in context, listen to its pronunciation and practise saying it.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Autor przyznaje rację przeciwnikowi tylko po to, by podważyć znaczenie tego ustępstwa w następnym zdaniu.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Voice analyzer
Listen, repeat and see which words were recognized as expected.
The author concedes a point to an opponent only to undermine the significance of that concession in the next sentence.
Ready for your attempt
Start speaking — your text will appear here.
This preview may change. The score appears after the attempt ends.Checking recognition support…
Scores are saved only on this device. Audio is not stored.
Recognition may use the browser provider's servers and require internet. We use the default microphone.
This is agreement with recognized text. Missing words can be recognition errors; the score does not assess individual speech sounds.
How is the score calculated?
Exact words get full credit; similar words get partial credit. Missing, replaced and extra words lower the score. Excellent requires all words in the right order. The 60/80% thresholds are experimental.
Dialogues in context
EN · C2- A
The author did concede the opponent’s point.
Autor przecież przyznał rację oponentowi.
- B
The author concedes a point to an opponent only to undermine the significance of that concession in the next sentence.
Autor przyznaje rację przeciwnikowi tylko po to, by podważyć znaczenie tego ustępstwa w następnym zdaniu.
- A
What do you suggest, then?
Co zatem proponujesz?
- B
Let’s read the concession together with the next sentence.
Przeczytajmy ustępstwo razem z następnym zdaniem.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
- A
How shall we check whether our criteria are appropriate?
Jak sprawdzimy trafność przyjętych kryteriów?
- B
The author concedes a point to an opponent only to undermine the significance of that concession in the next sentence.
Autor przyznaje rację przeciwnikowi tylko po to, by podważyć znaczenie tego ustępstwa w następnym zdaniu.
- A
What will help us compare these perspectives?
Co pomoże nam porównać te perspektywy?
- B
Let’s start with one example and note what accounts for the difference.
Zacznijmy od jednego przykładu i zapiszmy, z czego wynika różnica.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.
Translations
Examples of use
Precyzyjna krytyka sposobu uzasadniania i zakresu wniosków.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.A precise critique of reasoning and the scope of conclusions.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Begründungen und die Reichweite von Schlussfolgerungen präzise hinterfragen.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Cuestionar con precisión la argumentación y el alcance de las conclusiones.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.Точная критика аргументации и границ выводов.
No voice for this language is installed. Speech practice is still available.